<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Luxman R-1120</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classicreceivers.com/luxman-r-1120/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classicreceivers.com/luxman-r-1120</link>
	<description>Vintage Receivers From The 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:25:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://classicreceivers.com/luxman-r-1120/comment-page-1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 07:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicreceivers.com/?p=252#comment-237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luxman sound? It really depends on the model you are talking about. The R1120 is a great unit with the &quot;old&quot; Luxman sound as far as the transistor Luxmans go. I have one and I love it. Later in their history LV117, LV115 etc were amps with early D/A converters. These are what some term the Apline Luxman era. Fast, strong and a little dry as opposed to the old Luxman stuff. The LV 105 U was halfway in between the two &quot;sounds&quot;
My pic&#039;s include the L 530, L100 and SQ38 in the affordable range.
I hope that helps a little. I do say buy with caution, meaning have a good technician who can replace caps etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luxman sound? It really depends on the model you are talking about. The R1120 is a great unit with the &#8220;old&#8221; Luxman sound as far as the transistor Luxmans go. I have one and I love it. Later in their history LV117, LV115 etc were amps with early D/A converters. These are what some term the Apline Luxman era. Fast, strong and a little dry as opposed to the old Luxman stuff. The LV 105 U was halfway in between the two &#8220;sounds&#8221;<br />
My pic&#8217;s include the L 530, L100 and SQ38 in the affordable range.<br />
I hope that helps a little. I do say buy with caution, meaning have a good technician who can replace caps etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a__k</title>
		<link>http://classicreceivers.com/luxman-r-1120/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>a__k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 03:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicreceivers.com/?p=252#comment-113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gorgeous receiver with a beautiful wood cabinet and massive wpc output. A vintage thing of beauty.

Wonder how one would classify the Luxman sound.

I&#039;ve read the pioneers have high treble, while the marantz/harman kardon&#039;s are very warm and &#039;tube&#039; like.

Anyone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous receiver with a beautiful wood cabinet and massive wpc output. A vintage thing of beauty.</p>
<p>Wonder how one would classify the Luxman sound.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read the pioneers have high treble, while the marantz/harman kardon&#8217;s are very warm and &#8216;tube&#8217; like.</p>
<p>Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
