Kenwood KR-9050

 

Kenwood KR-9050

 

Many audio enthusiasts consider a monster receiver to be one that puts out 100 watts per channel or more. Well, this Kenwood KR-9050 puts out just that - 200 watts per channel. So, I guess it would be considered a monster receiver. It certainly has the size at almost 2 feet wide, over 18 inches deep and over 52 pounds! Still, the KR-9050 probably takes a back seat to the KR-9600 that collectors are the most fervent over. I'm not sure why because the 9600 has some design issues that can be difficult to overcome and only puts out 160 watts per channel. Perhaps it's that the KR-9600 so firmly established itself as the top of the line receiver for Kenwood it overshadowed the KR-9050 when it came out. The KR-9060 is really just a KR-9600 with a bronze faceplate.

 

kenwood-kr-9050-left

 

The Kenwood KR-9050 is the largest and most expensive receiver ever built by Kenwood.  It is also the most powerful at 200 watts per channel with only 0.02% total harmonic distortion. And, of course, Kenwood produced some of the best tuners ever. With its Quartz Lock, adjustable IF bandwidth and two-level Stereo Sensitivity there really isn't much more you could ask for in a tuner.

 

kenwood-kr-9050-mid

 

The KR-9050 is stuffed full with features and has analog meters spanning practically the entire length of the front of the receiver.  It also has a 1/4 inch MIC input with its own level control so you could even play your guitar through this receiver though I don't know if I'd recommended it. The only drawbacks to this receiver are that the switches are made of plastic and the knobs are plastic as well with metal caps and are not crisp in their operation.

 

kenwood-kr-9050-right

 

Wow, look at that massive toroidal transformer! It's actually larger than the transformer in the Pioneer SX-1250. Also, notice the large heatsinks that take up about a third of the inside of the unit.  As many audio techs know the KR-9600 has issues with both the power switch as well as the TA-200W power packs and Darlington transistors it uses which are prone to failure and replacements are virtually unobtainable. In contrast, the KR-9050 doesn't use the TA-200W or Darlington parts and is built with more easily replaceable parts. That is important if you plan on doing a restoration. A Kr-9600 that needs a resto is a totally different animal than a KR-9050 that needs the same.

 

Kenwood KR-9050 Inside

 

Kenwood receivers are a site to behold when fully lit up and the KR-9050 is no exception. It is definitely one of the nicest looking receivers in the dark.

 

kenwood-kr-9050-lit

 

Being a true monster receiver the Kenwood KR-9050 is not cheap. It's not very easy to find either and is probably more rare than the KR-9600. I've seen one sell for $1500 but I've seen a few listed at over $2000. That's a pretty big chunk of cash for a receiver but if you're a Kenwood fan and want a holy grail receiver from them then this might just be the one.

 

Vintage Kenwood KR 9050 High Speed DC Dual Power Stereo Receiver 1970s Rare
Vintage Kenwood KR 9050 High Speed DC Dual Power Stereo Receiver 1970s Rare $1,199.99
Time Remaining: 16d 18h 10m
Buy It Now for only: $1,199.99
Vintage KENWOOD KR 9400 Stereo Receiver
Vintage KENWOOD KR 9400 Stereo Receiver $690.00
Time Remaining: 5d 21h 52m
Buy It Now for only: $690.00
Vintage Kenwood KR 8010
Vintage Kenwood KR 8010 $500.00
Time Remaining: 22d 9h 18m
Buy It Now for only: $500.00

 

Here's a video showing the massive Kenwood KR-9050 in action:

 

3 thoughts on “Kenwood KR-9050

  1. “Many audio enthusiasts consider a monster receiver to be one that puts out 200 watts per channel or more.”

    Wrong. That should be corrected to 100 watts per channel or more. If you were around when this audio gear was being sold new, speakers, receivers and amps rated at 100 watts or more were pricey and desirable. Most lists online will start the Monster receivers at 100 watts per channel and rightly so. The Pioneer SX-1010 is considered to be the first Monster receiver to be offered and was rated at 100 watts per channel. Otherwise you have a great website.

  2. Hi Jack! Thanks for the comment. You are absolutely correct though some use 120 watts as a definition. It was a typo on my part and I have corrected it. Thanks for pointing it out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Scroll To Top