<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fisher 500C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classicreceivers.com/fisher-500c/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classicreceivers.com/fisher-500c</link>
	<description>Vintage Receivers From The 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a__k</title>
		<link>http://classicreceivers.com/fisher-500c/comment-page-1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>a__k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicreceivers.com/?p=264#comment-117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My mistake &#039;raiko&#039;, that is a HT-320 TT and not an HF-320.

Nothing special as far as the stylus is concerned as it looks to be stock/original.
I&#039;ll see how it all sounds first and proceed from there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mistake &#8216;raiko&#8217;, that is a HT-320 TT and not an HF-320.</p>
<p>Nothing special as far as the stylus is concerned as it looks to be stock/original.<br />
I&#8217;ll see how it all sounds first and proceed from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raiko</title>
		<link>http://classicreceivers.com/fisher-500c/comment-page-1#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>raiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicreceivers.com/?p=264#comment-116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the Hitachi equipment from that era is under appreciated. It&#039;s actually very good. I like the Yamaha type styling with the rectangular switch knobs as well. Nice stuff.
That would be an &lt;strong&gt;HT&lt;/strong&gt;-320 turntable right? The belts are available on eBay for around $10.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Hitachi equipment from that era is under appreciated. It&#8217;s actually very good. I like the Yamaha type styling with the rectangular switch knobs as well. Nice stuff.<br />
That would be an <strong>HT</strong>-320 turntable right? The belts are available on eBay for around $10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a__k</title>
		<link>http://classicreceivers.com/fisher-500c/comment-page-1#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>a__k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 02:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicreceivers.com/?p=264#comment-115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Center-mounted headphone port makes this amp look as though it was designed to drive headphones first and speakers second.

Keep em coming!

I had recently purchased a Hitachi HA-330 amp with a Hitachi FT-340 tuner and a Hitachi HF-320 TT. Need a belt for the TT but the rest sounds fantastic. A complete set from what I could tell (aside from the TT being black and not silver like the others)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Center-mounted headphone port makes this amp look as though it was designed to drive headphones first and speakers second.</p>
<p>Keep em coming!</p>
<p>I had recently purchased a Hitachi HA-330 amp with a Hitachi FT-340 tuner and a Hitachi HF-320 TT. Need a belt for the TT but the rest sounds fantastic. A complete set from what I could tell (aside from the TT being black and not silver like the others)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
